Lawmakers Press Tech Executives in a Marathon Oversight Hearing
A daylong session on data practices and platform safety produced sharp exchanges but no clear consensus on new federal rules.
A daylong congressional hearing on data practices and platform safety produced hours of pointed questioning, a few memorable exchanges, and little agreement on what, if anything, Washington should do next.
Members from both parties expressed frustration with how large platforms handle personal data and moderate content, but their proposed remedies diverged sharply. Some pushed for a comprehensive privacy law; others focused on transparency and competition.
Familiar terrain
The executives, veterans of such hearings, largely stuck to prepared themes, emphasizing investments in safety and openness to sensible rules. Lawmakers pressed for specifics on data retention and algorithmic ranking, with mixed success.
Observers noted that the hearing covered ground trod many times before, a reminder that the United States still lacks a general federal privacy statute even as most states have passed their own. The patchwork frustrates companies and advocates alike.
Whether the session moves legislation is doubtful in a crowded calendar, but committee leaders signaled they would keep the pressure on. For now, the gap between hearing-room rhetoric and enacted law remains wide.
More in Government & Politics
Congress Heads Into August Recess With a Fall Funding Fight Waiting
As the House left town and the Senate worked through a light week of votes, lawmakers deferred the hardest spending decisions to a crowded autumn calendar.
Michigan's Marquee Senate Primary Takes the National Stage in a Final Debate
Days before Michigan's primary, the leading Democratic contenders clashed in a closely watched debate for an open Senate seat that could help decide control of the chamber.
Appeals Courts Split Over Trump's Mail-In Voting Order, Teeing Up a Supreme Court Fight
Dueling federal appellate rulings within days of each other left the fate of the president's vote-by-mail executive order in the Supreme Court's hands, months before the November midterms.